First official announcements regarding the possible amendment of the current status of the broadcast media, the Global Media Monitoring of Venezuela believes it necessary to raise public opinion as follows:
1 .- The Centre must recall that radio waves are World Heritage, administered by each state, therefore, no individual can own more often, because only has the right to enjoy a concession by the State. The use of radio waves is for the nation as a whole and for the State to take administrative measures in accordance with established legal frameworks.
2 .- In the case of Venezuela, is not only appropriate but necessary to democratize the use of the public good, through the reallocation of frequencies and licenses, which allow an equitable distribution between the state sector, private and public space. It is necessary to establish a monitoring of its use through a regulatory framework that ensures the democratic use of them.
3 .- The private media sector for profit, as the state sector should each get one-third of the existing frequency. The remaining third must be accorded the so-called public space, consisting of university sectors, educational, cultural, community, trade unions, indigenous, urban as well as groups organized to ensure the use of those means intended as a public service. The ultimate goal of democratization is to involve all citizens. The Centre warns that today there are many radio and some television stations classified as "community" or are not representing the voice of communities.
4 .- The granting of licenses for use spectrum in all its forms, made during the "Fourth Republic", was almost exclusively for profit. With socio-political changes of the last 10 years, that original purpose, in most cases, is added and sometimes almost exclusively, a political objective in certain circumstances subversive characteristics assumed power constitutionally established . For that reason, the Centre believes that it is not sufficient to perform a new redistribution of the Union 's democratic effectively licenses. It should be remembered that the cartelization of the Venezuelan private media is based less on the transmission system (Networks) and unequivocal message dissemination. Hence the need to establish a regulatory framework must in no case should undermine freedom of expression, first considered as the absolute value in a democratic system.
5 .- The Centre recommends that the new legal frameworks, to take into account domestic production of content must be independent to the promotion of the state, according to a national plan to ensure its plurality and diversity. Also, a new legal framework should ensure full independence called public sector means not only of the big business sector but also the public sector.
6 .- In developing the regulatory framework for the operation of the broadcast media should be widely debated by journalists, businessmen, parliamentarians, academics, social movements and users is necessary to start from existing legal norms: Constitution National Penal Code and Ethical Standards for journalists. Stelling Maryclen
Wikipedia librarians endorse the coup in Honduras and "prevent" the return of President
coup While the Honduran government is still reeling and neither does the internal or external recognition for librarians of the Roberto Micheletti Wikipedia is the new president of Honduras. It is true that his alleged attempt to save objectivity with the following footnote on page: "de facto". " Full Text
Socialist Democracy supported the general strike on Thursday in Euskal Herria Socialist Democracy
Socialist Democracy announced that:
supports the general strike on Thursday 21 May in Euskal Herria and the Basque Country. Seconded strike by trade unions and other LAB, ELA, ESK, STEE-EILAS, Hiru, EHNE , CGT and CNT.
As always CCOO and UGT trade unions of the scheme, compliant with the PSOE, are unmarked by not supporting the fight and leaving the cumpromiso clear what their "class." This evidence once again, for the collective scorn of all / as the / the workers, who serve and who not.
criticize turn directions that IU and the PCE does not second, just as "our" general coordinator, Cayo Lara, went from champion general strike on tour in the bourgeois media. Socialist Democracy
sides with our fellow workers Basques / as part of the international working class and state. Mood
asked not vote for United Left in the European elections.
The / the components of Socialist Democracy (inward current UI) consider the nomination of the Left United for elections to the European Parliament does not meet the minimum necessary to ask the anti-capitalist vote for the coalition known decide to leave to the discretion of each DS activist vote on the option that best considered within all nominally are anti-capitalist ( UI, IA, II, etc.) and the opportunity to vote blank or abstain.
After analyzing the 52-page document that shapes the agenda for the European United Left ( Document ) we can see that this is a purely cut paper Social. In it, only used once the word "socialism" and no "anti-capitalism." Even on page 39 it was advocacy of "digital capitalism" (sic). This document is not cutting but a reformist agenda, which is a step backwards even compared to moderate, but more left than the current Declaration of Rivas ", supposedly marking the organization's future after his stage" Llamas "and in which the United Left proclaimed anti-capitalist organization struggling "XXI century socialism." As we have seen and feared, that are not just words, not hurricane winds, but the spring breeze, was carried with ease.
We have seen as the "Llamas" is not a last stage but the actual synergy and perennial a bureaucratic organization with a leadership absolutely at the feet of the system and the PSOE, which is not intended to end capitalism but to "manage it better." Proof is presented to the European elections with a game like Iniciativa per Catalunya Verds who participated from the Conselleria d'Interior de Catalunya in the fascist repression of anti-Bologna students hands (or clubs) of Catalan Police and is not considered anti-capitalist.
Socialist Democracy also wants to show his radical rejection of the timid attitudes /'s leaders regarding the banning IU International Initiatives and demands the immediate repeal of the Political Parties Law. In addition censorship undemocratic attitude of some / as these / those leaders who demanded to various UI elected to withdraw support to international initiatives such as Anti-Capitalist Left may be submitted to the European elections. This attitude is no longer "socialist" or "anti-capitalist," but simply "undemocratic."
Many as are looking for right now in libraries or Internet what Social Democracy. Search will be in vain because we are an underground movement until today. We are a group of militants who have quietly worked against reform of the organization derives from IU in which we find ourselves. Some learners from the management bodies, other / as from the ground, all / as the basis of the anti-capitalist, anti-liberal social reform struggles rotting capitalist and toxic venom emanates as institutional activities of most / the leaders of IU.
thought not to let us know so soon, but the shameful events in recent times, the elimination of democratic rights of pusillanimity of IU's best known faces in front of them and the statements on economic reform, we have made presentations having to rush.
Why are we in IU despite all this criticism?
For what we do as a tactical bet. We understand that IU is still a significant number of militants and sympathizers anti-capitalist revolutionaries, who softened and mesmerized / or muddy as / as for the false dialectic the leaders channel their energies towards the end of court reform. This is precisely what interests the Bourbon monarchy as a capitalist lackey of the international capitalist system.
addition, before the fascist climbing which we live, we think that the best way to fight inside the capital monster that ultimately we are all (society, work, unions, IU). We respect all those / as peers who have decided to leave IU to be considered impossible transformation. We deeply respect this decision, but we / as we are committed to be a link between these sisters anticapitalist organizations and foundations and supporters of IU anti-capitalist. Everyone has their role in the line between anti-capitalist left left system management. All those involved are needed / as, just different trenches within the same war against Capital. When the class struggle sharpens and exploit the contradictions we find together in new trenches. We can not let the tree stands we cover the forest of the revolution.
The battle for capitalist hegemony occurs field anyway contrast, anti-capitalist ground, for therefore believe that our role is to increase the anti-capitalist influence within IU, without giving up our ideals and our ability to critique. Therefore, we announced that any / a member of Socialist Democracy will come to manage the system with the right parties failing IU immediate expulsion of our revolutionary organization. We also announced that our critique of reformism of the / the leaders of IU is constant, if not rectified in his erratic and embarrassing venture.
Socialist Democracy is a purely militant anti-capitalist current within the reform coalition today is (sadly) Izquierda Unida. Socialist democracy is committed to the overthrow of capitalism and the struggle for hegemony against all reformist currents within IU (from so called "Llamas" to the PCE included). We know the objective difficulties involved in this goal, it is Socialist Democracy comrades and classmates in those / as honestly fight against capitalism and to refuse to participate in its management, are in the organization they are, inside or outside the United Left.
As
presentation emergency we have systematized a list of the points that distinguish the current Socialist Democracy reformist coalition majority in the UI (social-liberals, social democrats inside and outside the PCE, etc.):
1. fought to overthrow the capitalist system and to eliminate private ownership of the means of production and exchange, along with, of course, the right of inheritance. Humanity has no future under the genocide and extermination system that is capitalism, then, or just with him, or he will kill us.
2. We seek to build a new social learning from the mistakes of past revolutionary experiences.
3. We are open / as the union of anti-capitalist traditions different from the Marxist to libertarian socialism (anarchism), socialism called "utopian" eco-socialism, socialist humanism, etc. . We believe it is necessary the union of all / as the / the anti-capitalist sincere / as, for practicing the grassroots and build a radical democracy that other company needed: a socialist society. Consider essential in all contributions and debates within the / the anti-capitalist. There is much work to do and do not believe in the infallibility of any particular formula. We do not believe in historical determinism, at least at the level of technological development in the human being is, where has weapons (atomic) and threats (including climate change) that can kill all of the species itself.
4. not recognize the validity of the formula for dictatorship of the proletariat as a one-party dictatorship. This has been a wrong path and has only served to replace other elites that, as in the case of China or the former USSR, later transformed themselves into capitalists (like the pigs in Orwell's farm.)
5. We are committed and girls with radical democracy translated into permanent revocability all public offices and joint management between workers and consumers as the economy. We are inheritors of the teachings of the Paris Commune systematized, among others, Marx and Lenin .
6. turn our process is critical and ongoing debate, without taboos or sacred cow. " The debate we consider it a good in itself, necessary to preserve the health of any self-respecting revolutionary organization. The debate or criticism does not release the necessary support and solidarity (with Cuba or Venezuela for example) despite their mistakes.
specific points brought to our state reality:
1. End of pacts with the socialiberalismo, zero PSOE pact with the United Left. Absolute prohibition of government agreements with the center-right, both the PSOE and other parties to the right of UI (such as EA, ERC, ICV, BNG , BLOC, etc ...) Only allow the endowment thereof, without ever getting pacts of government or charges , should a party further to the right (PP) could be done with the government of the institution, were municipal, state or central government. Socialist democracy is not to manage the capitalist system, but to overthrow it and consider it suicide, impossible and unethical option of being able to reach agreements with the right, is moderate (PSOE) or extreme (PP).
2. uncheck all of the addresses of the UGT and CCOO, as the regime bureaucrats do but give back the entire working class of the State and serve the Employer.
3. recognition under international law to exercise self-determination of all peoples of the English State so decide democratically.
4. resolution of the conflict in Euskal Herria and the Basque Country by means of dialogue, immediate end to the persecution and criminalization of the political left wing nationalists. The end of violence can only come to the acceptance by the State of the possibility of Basque citizens to exercise the democratic right of self-restoration / partners needed the leftwing nationalist Basques (now without political rights) and of course, also with ETA's commitment to abandon the path of armed struggle. Steps must be synchronous and determined by both parties before the close supervision of international organizations agreed in advance by both parties.
5. Fight for the establishment of a constituent assembly to draft a new constitution that bar the Bourbon 1978 and proclaims, among other things, the Republic through a binding referédum on how government policy desired by the public.
6. To reduce unemployment: depletion of the working day for all / a laborer / ay nationalizations / immediate adjustments for all / in-state migrants. Also fighting for the establishment of workers' committees democratically elected in direct contact (regulated and guaranteed) with the Labour Inspectorate to stop the numerous terrorist attacks employer.
7. Nationalization of the entire banking system credit and insurance.
8. Land reform to deal definitively with the estate.
9. diversity Equality between men and women overcome the gender roles and not gender discrimination. All rights for gays, lesbians and transsexuals. Right to free abortion and free for women.
10. complete and immediate separation between churches and state religion.
La forma de implementar estos objetivos se hará mediante el debate de las bases, el método asambleario de abajo a arriba, única dirección válida en la democracia permanente y radical en la que creemos y nos reconocemos.
A partir de ahora, los/las componentes de IU que sean también activistas miembros de Democracia Socialista que así lo deseen, podrán dar a conocer su doble militancia. Cada cual decidirá personalmente los tiempos correctos. Sin embargo, como organización, una vez dada a conocer a la ciudadanía, es imposible volver al secretismo anterior. Por ello, soon, we will complete our blog ( http://democratasysocialistas.blogspot.com/ ) where you can view our ideals, struggles, and opinions. For now, you can write to: democratasysocialistas@gmail.com
Education, Cybernetics and Informatics: SIECI 2009 - Orlando, Florida ~ EE. U.S.
Sixth Iberoamerican Symposium Education, Cybernetics and Informatics: SIECI 2009
in the context of
Eighth Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics: CISCI 2009
10 to 13 July 2009, Orlando, Florida USA ~
Propósito
increasingly are being rapidly multiply and intensify the interrelations between the disciplines of Education and Training and Information Technology and Cybernetics. Product of these relationships are presented in sometimes unexpected ways, but with original and effective ideas, new tools and methodologies, which identify new synergies between the two disciplines. Accordingly, the primary purpose of the Ibero-American Symposium on Education, Cybernetics and Informatics (SIECI 2009) is to provide a forum to academicians, professionals and consultants in both disciplines: the educational and computer / cyberspace.
What are the Areas of Interest of SIECI 2009?
Applications of Information and Communications Technologies in Education and Training.
Systems and Technologies in Education and
Training Application
Educational Technologies
Who can participate in SIECI 2009?
To comply with the stated purpose, it invites researchers from the school area and Cyber \u200b\u200bTechnologies and Information (ICT) to present both the results of their work research and possible new ideas or working hypotheses that can generate and whose plausibility, feasibility, relevance and usefulness merit further research and reflection. It also invites scholars, practitioners and consultants to present case studies, applications and information systems developed for specific purposes, and new ideas, designs and methodologies. Also invites researchers in education and teachers to submit their thoughts on the impact of ICT in education and in their methods and designs corporate training or society in general. Similarly, managers are invited to schools and corporate human resource managers to present the issues they may have, the effects, positive and negative, observed following the application of ICT to the educational and corporate training. Overall, both are invited to create solutions, or ideas for solutions, and those who have problems that can be solved in ways that relate to ICT education, or have seen new problems created by an application of ICT to education. In this framework, are invited to participate by sending articles and / or organizing an invited session on a topic of interest to the organizer.
Decisions on acceptances relating to items listed will be based on content reviews or the CV of the author. Session items will not be evaluated and a decision on acceptance will be based on the topic and the CV of the author.
What questions do not exclude others, deserve answers or reflections on ICT?
What is the impact of ICT in education and training?
How are ICTs affecting and / or improving the effectiveness and / or efficiency of education and training?
What new models, methods, methodologies and educational networks are emerging through the application of ICT in this area?
How is it affecting the use of ICT in universities, schools, colleges and other educational organizations and / or corporate training?
What tool and / or methodologies based on the use of ICT exist to facilitate distance learning, e-learning and corporate training?
How
can participate actively in SIECI 2009?
Those interested in participating in SIECI 2009, may do so through the following not mutually exclusive:
Submit one or more research, solutions, presentations, case studies or any of the types of work mentioned in the next section.
organize one or more Invited Sessions and panel (with a minimum of 5 papers).
Review and evaluate research papers and articles submitted.
promote and disseminate the purposes of the symposium.
recommend it to academic researchers for their active participation in research papers and articles submitted. Propose
organizations, institutes and universities as sponsors.
What are the types of work and presentations with which you can participate?
preliminary or final results of research.
Papers concerning reflections on experiences of professional practice.
Papers relating to case studies.
Papers relating to opinions based on experiences and insights possible and / or working hypotheses.
Reports on the development of particular information systems or specific methodologies that have shown effectiveness in implementation.
thoughtful review and summary of papers published in a given area.
Papers relating to the development of theoretical or methodological.
Presentation of innovations, both in terms of products, such as processes, methods and methodologies.
Decisions on acceptances related to the work or proposals presented are based on the reviews conducted by experts or the CV of the author. Items of special sessions are not evaluated by the program committee of the symposium and the decision on acceptance will be based on the topic and the CV of the author.
What is the format for abstracts or drafts of Articles?
abstracts or drafts of articles must be delivered according to the following specifications:
Item Interest Area for one of those mentioned above as items the symposium.
Authors and coauthors with their names, address, phone / fax, email (e-mail), affiliation and curriculum vitae.
Article Title.
Summary only presentation (200 to 500 words), extended abstract of the article (from 400 to 2,000 words) or full working draft (2,000 to 5,000 words) in English or Portuguese.
Abstracts and drafts of full papers should be submitted through the symposium web address Article Referral , filling the respective format and upload the file for the article. If the site is not accessible at the time, you can also send your item via e-mail using the Contact Us information , with each of the aforementioned data.
